Open Office Designs, Collaboration and Productivity - The Ongoing Debate

The Michigan CEO Summit this month was a terrific event chaired by Doug Rothwell, President of Business Leaders of Michigan, at the Westin Book Cadillac November 9^th.  This was a fast-paced event with exceptional speakers and a great group of participants.  Most presenters and panels were 15 to 25 minutes; a good pace.

I had three favorites during the day. One was Brian Walker, CEO of Herman Miller, talking about the future of office space.  Most attention getting for me was his speculation that our furniture would become “smart” and rise to greet us in the morning while reacting to our arrival in the office.  My particular takeaway was the opportunity which exists to create more open and engaged work spaces and work places. For example, Herman Miller offers this Hive configuration, designed for team collaboration.

Smart office furniture can provide terrific ergonomic benefits. Can it in any way address other satisfaction and productivity issues? Can work station lighting, height and other productivity benefits help us thrive in an open office environment?

The open office approach has become the singular answer to how a company trying to collaborate and innovate should be configured, as we all emulate cultural icons like Zappos and Google. Yet recent articles in Forbes, The Washington Post and elsewhere have raised significant questions about whether the open office environment really delivers what we expected. Based largely on a 2013 research study published in The Journal of Environmental Psychology, they are making the case that the loss in productivity and even health issues due to the noise and stress of an open environment is significant, while little evidence can be found for increased collaboration or work satisfaction. In fact, another trend – allowing people to work from home – shows much more promise in terms of increased productivity and innovation.

So, did we jump too quickly into the sexy idea of highly energetic and collaborative spaces fueling culture and creativity, or is there something we are missing? Could training play a role? What if people moving to a new environment were brought together to agree on new cultural norms and cues? What if they were supported in developing new habits and behaviors, skills and approaches to work, that would minimize the downsides of an open environment while realizing the benefits we’d all like to see gained through productive collaboration and problem-solving?

Learning and Performance Improvement peeps – what are your thoughts? Any experiences? Do you know of anyone who is intentionally developing people to help them perform in and maximize the promise of these environments? As far back as the mid-90s, when companies were first starting to try out the movement out of private offices and into smaller, more open work spaces, Prism worked with the GM Truck Group as they relocated their engineers to Centerpoint. Much thought and care went into their assimilation into the new environment. In our fast-paced world today, has this idea been lost?

Those of you who are working in an open environment, how’s your productivity? Are there positive impacts? What would make it more positive?

We’d love to hear your experiences and viewpoints.

Bill Ford at the Detroit Economic Club: A Perspective on the Future

October 31 was not only Halloween, it was a day on which Bill Ford was the speaker at the Detroit Economic Club luncheon meeting.  Beth Chappell delivered great questions to Bill and he responded on topics including autonomous vehicles, Amazon’s look at Detroit as a new headquarters, Detroit’s new spirit, Ford’s competitiveness and their position in the automotive market.

Here is a link to the video of the extended interview if you would like to see it Bill Ford at Detroit Economic Club.  Bill’s comments were constructive and particularly positive relative to Ford’s efforts in the personal transportation marketplace.  Would we have expected any less? Compelling comments though, and most striking to me, his view that the market is not about the tech which can be designed into the car, it is about people’s needs for transportation.  He spoke about how people in some areas of the world have far different needs than those of us here in Detroit or Chicago or less urban areas of the U.S.  Creating vehicles with the right technology to address these many human needs is the right challenge. 

Admittedly, I started thinking about the public transit challenge we seem to have in the Detroit area.  As a student of the autonomous vehicle technology and one who is working with some of the players bringing it to reality, there is a great facilitation challenge I would like to work.  The challenge would be to have the right people in the room to address the evolution of the autonomous vehicle tech, as a solution to the many stories about how long it takes someone using public transport to get to or from a job.  That would be a great and meaningful discussion.   

I have every confidence there will be a solution available for this in the next five years.  It should be very possible to have customized routes depending on who is looking for a ride and where they are going.  I would like to know if SMART or DDOT is working on this – if you know, please send me a note tom@prismls.com).  If you are creating this solution, come and talk to us at Innovate Farmington!